The analysis of consideration perceptions is considered one of the fundamental issues in epistemology and philosophy of science. Allameh Tabataba'i, in order to avoid confusing this type of perception with real perceptions and to respond to fallacies in this regard, has analyzed and explained the characteristics of consideration perceptions and explained how they are formed based on the theory of Sakkaki in the discussion of truth and metaphor. The authors, initially, using a descriptive-analytical method, have provided a clear picture - far from the complexities of related research - of Allameh Tabataba'i's theory of consideration perceptions; In the next stage, four main objections were analyzed and answered, which are: the lack of evidence and the lack of necessary logic and roots of a theory; confirmation of absolute relativism of moral propositions by his statements in the sixth article of the book “Principles of Philosophy and Method of Realism”; denial of the relationship between is and ought due to considering all the oughts and ought nots between the soul and human actions as conventional and shaking the foundations of ethics, jurisprudence, etc.; lack of knowledge of souls in the context of attention to these considerations that are the action of the soul. The novelty of the present article is, firstly, that it shows that without referring to other works of Allameh Tabataba'i and by emphasizing the book “Principles of Philosophy and Method of Realism”, one can also answer the objections; secondly, it emphasizes and analyzes the three categories of consideration perceptions and clarifies that in some of the objections to Allameh Tabataba'i's theory of consideration perceptions, the fallacy of homonymy has occurred.