Among the topics in the principles of jurisprudence, the discussion of verbal principles and their significant instances, namely the principles of appearance (Asalat al-Zuhur), generality (Asalat al-Umum), absoluteness (Asalat al-Itlaq), and concepts, hold special importance due to their extensive application in jurisprudence and the derivation of jurisprudential issues. However, in the books on the principles of jurisprudence, the validity and application of these principles have been discussed only about jurisprudential derivations. Despite the high importance of these principles and the abundance of doctrinal texts, unfortunately, no specific discussion has been conducted on their validity and application in other areas such as doctrinal verses and narrations. This study proves the validity and authority of these principles in deriving doctrinal knowledge from traditional religious texts. It addresses the objections regarding the uncertainty of the indications of verbal principles and the non-ritualistic nature of the doctrinal domain, establishing their validity in deriving doctrinal knowledge in certain areas. It also clarifies the differences in their application in the sciences of philosophy, theology, and exegesis, and provides examples of scholars’ use of these principles in the field of doctrines. Additionally, it emphasizes the observance of ijtihad rules and the precedence of certain rational judgments. Notably, the central reason underpinning the validity of these principles can also serve as the basis for their validity in deriving other areas of religious knowledge, such as ethics, contemporary human sciences, history, natural sciences, and more. The research method in this study is analytical-descriptive, referring to sources in the principles of jurisprudence, theology, philosophy, exegesis, and hadith, and presenting examples of the use of these principles in exegetical books, particularly Allameh Tabatabaei’s Tafsir al-Mizan.