نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Selecting an appropriate reasoning method to attain reality has always been a focal point for philosophers and intellectuals. Consequently, various models of reasoning have been proposed, each offering a distinct method to achieve reality rationally. Among these, Socrates, the founder of academic philosophy, introduced a reasoning method rooted in dialogue and dialectical coherence. This study reinterprets Socratic reasoning and philosophical education through the foundational principles of Mulla Sadra's philosophy. Employing an analytical-documentary method, this research examines the epistemological and ontological bases of Transcendent Wisdom to analyze these foundations concerning a proper reasoning methodology. The findings indicate that reasoning fundamentally begins with identifying epistemic gaps, and questioning serves as a mechanism to uncover these gaps. Thus, an effective reasoning method must take the form of dialogue-driven inquiry. In this context, critical thinking should guide questioning, while creative thinking should shape responses. This analysis ultimately corroborates the Socratic method of reasoning. Therefore, the method of Socratic thinking not only aligns with Sadrian philosophy but also represents the most valid form of reasoning.
کلیدواژهها English
